The Coming of Conan Re-Read: “Black Colossus”

comingofconanBill Ward and I are reading our way through the Del Rey Robert E. Howard collection The Coming of Conan. This week we’re discussing “Black Colossus.” We hope you’ll join in!

Howard: Maybe it’s not as deep, or as soulful, as some that are more routinely mentioned by Howard scholars, but this is one of my favorite Conan stories.  This is the work of a master who knows exactly how far to push every moment, and understands exactly what his audience wants. Robert E. Howard is in complete control of this narrative from beginning to end.

bc1Look at that great opening, with its master thief and the tomb hung with menace. We witness the skill and capability of Shevatas, which makes it even more worrisome when it’s clear that he’s dead or worse by the segment’s end — an end that occurs off camera, to heighten suspense. And then, in section 2, we get  Yasmela. REH was perfectly capable of showing us strong, independent women, but Yasemela isn’t really one of them. She’s a pampered princess in need of protection, but determined to help her nation… AND she’s gorgeous and prone to being naked. REH had to have known that red blooded heterosexual male readers would feel an instinctual desire for her, as well as a compulsion to protect her both from the creepy sorcerer and her other worries. We admire her pluck and courage and know that she needs someone (not us, though we might wish that) to rescue her. Yeah, she might not be real, but REH is playing us guys like a musician with a fiddle. He KNOWS the notes to hit to get the effect on us he likes.

bc2Bill: She’s an interesting parallel to Bêlit. Both are in positions of power, and both admire and rely on Conan because he is a cut above their own subjects. Yasmela has seen many strong men before in her capacity as ruler, but none such as Conan, whom she senses is no supplicant; he has never knelt before any man. Mitra certainly knows how to pick them!

Howard: Man, does Conan enter in style this time, from stage right. The events are in motion, the pieces introduced, and then he’s there, larger than life and ready to wade into adventure. Well, first he’s ready to sweep Yasmela to bed, but once he sees what’s under way, he speaks plainly and wisely. There are so many great, simple lines here that reveal Conan’s character. I love how Conan talks tactics: “It’s no more than sword-play on a larger scale. You draw his guard, then – stab, slash! And either his head is off, or yours.”

bc3Bill: And when Yasmela’s generals get their first look at him, he’s half-drunk and gnawing on a beef bone. From that great introduction onward the story really plays with the class and culture differences of the various players, until the final battle itself is a clash between salt-of-the-earth professional soldiers and a nobleman-led force under Nathok the Veiled One — the great Thugra Khotan, returned after three thousand years to have his vengeance on the descendants of the Hyborian hordes who crushed his old empire.

Howard: Really good point. This is blue collar versus the upper crust. This isn’t a later generation’s “promised stable boy/forgotten prince.” Conan rises to lead because of his own skills and inborn traits.

bc4Come chapter IV are some very fine mass battle scenes and descriptive passages of great excellence. Savor these lines that would cost hundred of thousands of dollars to film: “In the early haze of dawn the streets of Khoraja were thronged by crowds of people who watched the hosts frizzing from the southern gate. The army was on the move at last. There were the knights, gleaming in richly wrought plate-armor, colored plumes waving above their burnished sallets. Their steeds, caparisoned with silk, lacquered leather and gold buckles, caracoled and curvetted as their riders put them through their paces. The early light struck glints from lance points that rose like a forest above the array, their pennons flowing in the breeze.”

Bill: And even more great word-painting when the battle itself occurs. That does remind me, though, of one thing I’ve never been crazy about in the Conan stories, and that’s the anachronistic technology in them. The french chivalric lexicon of armor pieces that is on display in this and some of the other stories (“they brought harness to replace Conan’s chain-mail — gorget, sollerets, cuirass, pauldrons, jambes, cuisses, and sallet.”) and some other anomalies like arbalests, is right out of the High Middle Ages, and just never feels right to me. Conan illustrators must agree, as I can’t recall ever seeing him in 15th century plate armor, indeed the Del Rey edition’s beautiful full page picture depicting the scene you quoted above, Howard, is distinctly bronze age Assyrian or Babylonian in character. It’s a minor criticism of something that never truly detracts from the story, and I will admit that in other respects certain anachronistic aspects of the Hyborian Age only add to its charm, but it does somewhat undermine my suspension of disbelief — I read those things and think more about REH’s influences than Conan’s world.

bc6Howard: That’s something I notice but rarely pay much heed to. I guess I just gloss over the armor issue as I roll my eyes only a little at the reference to what sounds like age of sail ships in other Conan tales. The thing that does grate on me in Howard’s fiction is the occasional info dump/plot advancement through dialogue, even though I know that it was standard at the time. (I’ve read plenty of old fiction that does the same.) A lot of the time REH doesn’t lean on those techniques at all, so that when he does it really stands out. For instance, I’ve never much cared for the first story he wrote about Cormac Fitzgeoffrey because it’s weighted down with backstory through conversation that doesn’t sound remotely real. And yet within a little while after crafting it REH turned around and wrote some of the best historical fiction ever set to paper, completely free of any sort of hint of that.

I suppose that we all come to fantasy fiction, or any fiction, really, with the ability to glory in some things and ignore others, and our enjoyment of one kind of genre depends in part upon what we can overlook. My wife and I enjoy a lot of the same sorts of stories, and I was both thrilled and surprised that she loved Harold Lamb’s tales of Khlit the Cossack. But she doesn’t care for Robert E. Howard in part because she finds the writing “purple.” Whereas I think REH at his finest is an incredible prose stylist. And I do think that Howard’s writing does appeal more to men than women, although such a broad brush comment shouldn’t be read as me saying that no women enjoy his work.

bc5But I’ve drifted off topic. To return to “Black Colossus,” I think too often in fiction all the rulers and villains and principal characters are brilliant schemers. That’s just not as interesting from a sociological standpoint. Lots of history was made because people weren’t clever enough to make good choices. Student of history that he was, Robert E. Howard knew that battles hinged sometimes on poor or very human decisions. I love that the arrogant count Thespides, the knight, is more certain of victory depending upon his station and status than an actual knowledge of tactics, and I love that Yasmela, unschooled in warfare, thinks Conan in error for not supporting the count’s attack.

Bill: It’s wonderful stuff, as is the resultant exchange between Conan and his former mercenary commander, Amalric, who remarks that Thespides’ hot-headed charge is the sort of thing that Conan used to get up to. Conan agrees, but says that was when he was only worried about his own hide, now he’s responsible for others. Here Conan’s essential decency and honor feeds right into his maturation — this battle is his first command, and it’s really a freak of fortune that Conan is even in this position. But he’s smart, and he respects his fellow soldiers, having emerged just days before from their ranks himself, and all of that factors into him growing into a position of responsibility. Earlier, there is also reference to how kingly he looks all decked out in his new armor, something Conan would retain in the back of his mind for years. He’s growing as a character right before our eyes, a rather amazing thing considering these are stand-alone stories told in no particular order.

Robert E. Howard

Robert E. Howard

Howard: Oh yeah. I enjoy Amalric, and how we learn more about Conan through him. Again we see REH’s ability to give us a character for just a few brief scenes and make us fond of him — even though, if you peer behind the curtain, you can sort of see that Amalric’s real purpose is just to provide information or show us Conan in a different light. A lesser writer would have written him without managing to make us care about the character.

Bill: When we at last get to the climactic battle, it’s Conan’s patience, cunning, and cool that win the day. He stops a route of his hillman with his own raw presence, doesn’t commit to the battle when Thespides launches his foolish assault, and has the sense to risk a flank attack with Amalric when he sees that only a desperate move can bring victory. His counter-charge into the teeth of Nathok’s horde is done with makeshift cavalry — all the footman and mercs who never were themselves knights, hammering into a horde of aristocrats and their, possibly enchanted, slave soldiers. In the end, it’s ‘blue collar’ professionals led by a bone-gnawing pragmatist that route the proud charioteers and desert fanatics of the long-lost Sorceror-King.

Howard: It’s a textbook example of how to write mass battle sequences. Anyone wanting to write a battle scene with ancient or medieval armies needs to read this tale, or at least that final chapter. I think I could read it over and again and still be learning how its done.

My schedule precluded me from participating in any discussion this week, but I hope to drop by to see your own reactions to “Black Colossus” in the coming days. Next week, “Iron Shadows in the Moon.”

 

18 Comments on “The Coming of Conan Re-Read: “Black Colossus”

  1. Gotta love that Weird Tales cover (wasn’t this Conan’s first cover story?) — despite Yasmela’s initial impulse to crawl to Mitra’s shrine nude being overruled by her more knowledgeable maid, it was clearly too titillating an image to pass up. Mitra might want a person to come before him clothed and standing tall, Farnsworth Wright not so much.

    REH complained about the end of “Black Colossus” (and the need to sex-up his stories in general), which was re-written from Conan telling Yasmela to cool it, there was still man’s work to be done, to the current afternoon delight version. I think I prefer the ending as it is now — Conan might have grown in terms of responsibility and patience in this story but, once the day’s work is done and near-certain disaster averted, a barbarian has got to live a little!

    Also, in some small way, Conan’s “born on the battlefield” backstory, which first appears here, ties in better with the end as it is now. For Conan there is always life in the midst of death, that’s at the core of his character. Wouldn’t it be great if one day a prince of Khoraja, Yasmela’s heir, tells the story of being conceived on a battlefield by the great hero who defeated Nathok?

  2. This is in my top three and has two of my favorite moments in all of Conan, when Mitra guides Yasmela to the drunken Conan as the savior of her people (I agree, one of the greatest of his entrances) and when Conan knocks the terrified subordinate out with the beef bone.

    I love how readily Conan settles into his command. Particularly when Thespides kind of ignores his suggestions and Custer-style rides down into the valley and Amaric calls him a fool. Conan just shrugs it off.

    “Let them be,” replied Conan. “It goes hard for them to take orders from me.”

    He completely understands the class barrier, and doesn’t begrudge Thespides for it, recognizing they are allies and infighting doesn’t help anything.

  3. I remember an interview with one of the screenwriters of the 2011 Conan the Barbarian who said something along the lines of when you read the Conan stories, he doesn’t have any kind of arc. I just wanted to scream!!

    Taken as a whole, Conan’s arc is throughout the series of REH’s short stories. Here, as cited in the comments above we see Conan grow and mature as a military and political leader. Movie screenwriters always miss the point with Conan because they look at each individual story rather than the collective whole which is a story of his life. Not pre-planned, not chronological (as written), and not even finished. But the Conan in “Tower of the Elephant” is different from the Conan in “Phoenix on the Sword.”

  4. One of my favorite stories as well. Perhaps the funniest moment of any Conan story, when Yasmela draws the curtain aside and there’s Conan with his feet up, gnawing on a beefbone—and gives Amalric that grin. Hilarious!

    I also love how Conan changes his approach when he assumes responsibility for the lives of many men. It shows his great character. I also love how understanding he is about Thespides bad attitude, and how he explains it to Amalric. Conan demonstrates here not only intelligence, but emotional intelligence. And compassion/tolerance. These are the kinds of subtleties and sophistication of character missing from most Conan pastiches and the Conan films. He isn’t a caveman. He’s is a barbarian with incredible perception about people and his own code of honor.

    Also, I’m not a fan of big battle scenes. They usually bore me. Howard is one of the few who have me mesmerized almost every time, and especially in this story.

    • Hey Robert — nice point about him changing approaches as Conan grows responsible, and his understanding and perception and emotional intelligence. Most pastiche writers never got that.

    • Yes, same story, “Iron Shadows” was the original title and the Del Rey collection uses that.

  5. There’s not much I can add to what’s been said. The scene where Yasmela pulls back the curtain is a great example of REH using humor. REH isn’t usually thought of as a writer of humorous stories, but he was quite adept at some forms of humor. That skill usually wasn’t on display in his fantasy and horror stories, but he uses it effectively here.

    • Howard is hilarious when he wants to be. The Breckinridge Elkins stories are really very funny. Used to read them out loud to my wife for a good laugh.

      • That’s great! I’ve read a number of them. I was determined to read through my collection, but put it aside so I wouldn’t read too many in a row, and now it’s been so long I may have to start at the beginning again.

        He had a lot more range than people usually give him credit for.

    • Hey Keith,

      REH could be GREAT with humor, but you’re right, he doesn’t usually get though of as a humorist. I happen to think his historical short “Gates of Empire” is one of the funniest things he ever wrote. It’s an adventure story and great slapstick besides. I would gladly have read more of that kind of story from him.

  6. Nothing really to add. What a great epic story crammed into so few pages.

    Bill – somewhere, I have kicking around an essay by Sprague de Camp, history buff that he was, taking REH to task for his indiscriminate mixing of historic periods. Myself, it’s never bother me too much. I’ve always viewed the Hyborian tales as REH’s sandbox to play with all the cool elements he loved; Caribbean pirates, Cossacks, etc.

    • That’s one of the things that appeals to me about the Hyborian world REH created, the way different historical periods are mixed. Somewhere REH said this approach didn’t require him to know great amounts of detail. Thus he was able to use whatever level of civilization was appropriate for the story he wanted to tell without having to worry about getting the historical particulars wrong. And really, when you think about it, this approach adds a sheen over verisimilitude to his fantasy world because the level of technology in various parts of the world today range from stone age to high tech.

      • That last sentence in particular is a really good point. We’re not “the jungle planet” or “the water world” where all we have is related to one environment or people, as in old science fiction.

      • The terms used for weapons and armor in some stories are something I always notice and always feels a bit off to me. But generally I assume that Howard is using a word that he knows to describe something that is similar. And when you look at the historic uses of many technical terms, particularly in weapons and armor, people used them mostly as generic categories. Specific terms being used for specific types of construction in specific places and periods is a fairly recent development. When you look at reports from visitors to Asia in the 19th century, everyone is talking about the counts and dukes of Japan, or how ancient Chinese armies were using halberds. Or you have translations of Roman accounts that call spanish cleaving swords “sabers”.
        I think when Howard writes of “knights” wearing “sallets”, he probably didn’t mean 15th century heavy cavalry in German plate armor. It still looks odd on the page, but something that is easy to gloss over.

    • Yeah, it allowed him to have fun and tell whatever he was in the mood to tell without having to spend even more time with historical research.

  7. Pingback: Black Gate » Blog Archive » Discovering Robert E. Howard: Howard Andrew Jones and Bill Ward Re-Read “Black Colossus”

  8. As a novice writer, I am especially awed by Howard’s ability to give his readers background info in such a way that we want to hear more. In a few words, REH anticipates our questions and tells us how Shevatus acquired the mysterious ritual to open the bronze door “whose smooth surface offered no bolt or catch.” At the same time, he also gives us more about Shevatus’ character and his dedication to obtaining the treasure. “Not for naught had he gained access into darksome cults, had harkened to the grisly whispers of the votaries of Skelos under midnight trees, and read the forbidden iron-bound books of Vathelos the Blind.”

    And he did it in one sentence.
    Barbara
    .

Leave a Reply to Kerstan Szczepanski Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.